How to Ruin a Debt Crisis

Yesterday afternoon, money folks around the world exhaled.  American lawmakers, through no fault of their own, came to their senses and voted to extend the American debt ceiling to a number beyond the comprehension of mortal man.  The crisis was averted, and now we can all go about our business again.  Crap!  This is only a temporary truce.  The real war is still going on.

For the last couple of months, there’s been a media laser beam zeroed in on the House, the Senate and Barack Obama, as each one, in turn, demonstrated their inability to grasp simple economics.  As in, if Johnny has 14 trillion apples and he eats every single one of them, his kids are basically screwed on the apple front.  There have been any number of talking head solutions: stop spending my money; tax that guy over there; blame the Chinese; sell the Grand Canyon — and the etceteras just get stranger after that.  It’s hard to imagine that anybody (politicos or pundits) within limousine distance of Capital Hill has the foggiest idea of what’s going on.  Perhaps they should ask the servants – who would probably tell them you can’t borrow yourself out of debt.

Everybody knows that once money gets a nickel past a billion, it’s no longer real.  It’s figures on a page, triangles on a pie chart or bars on a graph – that’s all.  There is no real connection between Sangee’s Daycare money in Lincoln Nebraska and firing off million dollar missiles in war-torn Katphoodistan.  Try as they might, even the brainiest of America’s elected representatives can’t conceive of how much money they’re playing with.  Nor can they understand the simple dollars and cents or it.  The concept that it’s Sangee’s money they’re spending is overwhelmed by the magnitude of the mortgage.  So let’s quit with the rhetoric, folks, and get on with it.

Outside the media glare, there’s a whole different round of battles going on between the House, the White House and the Senate. (What I like to call The Axis of Feeble)  It’s these battles that are dictating the course of events in Washington, not any lawmaker’s inherent concern for Sangee, her money or her well-being.  (FYI, Senators Johanns and Nelson, I’m not picking on you.  I just think Lincoln represents America more than Miami does.)

One of these is the never-ending war between the Executive and Legislative branches of government.  This firefight has flared and died throughout US history, depending on how tough the president is.  These latest skirmishes started when Richard Nixon and Rose Mary Woods destroyed 18.5 minutes’ worth of audiotape — and 184 years of White House prestige — one afternoon in 1973.  Currently, President Obama’s hands-off approach to leadership, has opened the door for crybabies like Boehner to stride around as if they’re on their way to the OK Corral.  Unfortunately, none of them could win an audition on Buffalo Bill’s Mild West Show.  This is where ineffective governance comes from: half a dozen wannabes, whine-slapping each other across the media.  Like it or not, at least Pelosi had the cojones to tell Obama what Obamacare was going to look like.  This crew is scared of their own shadows, and America is whispering because of it.  There’s enough naked power in Washington at this moment to light the entire world — and not three people in town willing to reach for the switch.  Expect more of the same until somebody quits signing pledges to do good and actual does it.  Or until somebody in the White House hotwires the podium to the teleprompter and Obama has to come up with a policy beyond, “We hope to change.”

Furthermore, for the last year or so, the only issue American lawmakers seem interested in fighting for is infighting.  The two-party system is rapidly dissolving into a four, six or eight party fiasco, bent on emulating a 1920s Balkan republic.  The beauty of the two-party system is consensus has to be reached within the party before it ever goes to the electorate.  Whether it was Republicans, Democrats, Whigs or Free Soilers, historically, parties have always fought it out among themselves, long before election time.  They came up with a coherent plan, presented it to the people and let them decide.  This allows for some pretty big umbrellas; different constituents can gather together in general agreement to advance a common purpose.  These days, every Tom, Ron and Michele has their own agenda.  Every issue is a consensus-building minefield.   Every petty opinion demands a voice in a St. Vitus Dance of disagreement.  And every time you turn around, nothing is getting done because every cockeyed notion available needs to be considered.  Propelled by deluded self-importance and an ever-present phalanx of self-serving lobbyists, lawmakers have abandoned ideals in favour of narrow topical ideas which have no connection to the common good (beyond the next election.)  They disdain compromise, in favour of self-proclaimed principles whose shelf life is tied to FOX, CNN and MSNBC.  How can I make these statements?  Easy!  I’ve witnessed the last six months of Washington tomfoolery.

Yesterday, American lawmakers raised the debt ceiling because they had to.  They had no choice.  The very best, well-informed, educated, supported, principled government on the planet ran out of time — like a sophomore with a term paper.  Why?  It’s not like they didn’t know the deadline was coming.  There are several versions of what just happened in Washington, depending on which side of the aisle your sympathies lie.  However, it was John Adams who said, “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”  The facts are those in America charged with maintaining and enhancing the common good have turned their considerable skills, resources and attention away from that task to fight the uncivil wars of petty politics.  They haven’t abandoned Sangee in Nebraska so much as ignored her.  Honestly, if I were
she, come November 2012, I’d shake their buttons off.

Michele Bachmann: Take Her Seriously

On Monday, Michele Bachmann declared she was a candidate for President of the United States.  Nobody was shocked but I — and several million other people — got real interested in American politics – real fast.  Ms. Bachmann brings huge flair to a GOP campaign that, so far, has lacked a discernable pulse.  John Stewart and Stephen Colbert are peeing their pants anticipating their autumn TV ratings.  The girls from The View are sharpening their claws.  And journalists from here to McMurdo Station, Antarctica are dissecting every word she’s ever uttered to find a “pants on fire” error.  The big gun personalities, however, are still waiting in the weeds, but they’ve put their assistants on bread and water until they come up with 2012’s defining “gotcha” question.  Chris Wallace seriously jumped the gun on Sunday when he asked her — point blank — “Are you a flake?”  Pure idiot – he probably won’t get another crack at her and will be sniping from the sidelines once the action really heats up next year.

If I sound jaded, I’m not.  If I sound like a supporter, I’m not.  I’m just very aware that Bachmann is being painted as Sarah Palin in a skirt; she’s not.  There are some similarities, certainly; both desperately need a full-time fact checker, for one.  But I’m warning you, folks: take this woman seriously.

Sarah Palin was (and still is) a Republican mistake.  She was supposed to be the sacrificial “hockey mom” to the ’08 Obama juggernaut.  Unfortunately, she didn’t shut up and go home after it was all over.  Instead, she hung on to the spotlight and the microphone (I think she likes them) and became Sarah Palin, sideshow.  Along the way, she changed politics forever.

Michele Bachmann is nobody’s sacrificial lamb.  She’s serious.  She has an army of resolute supporters.  She can raise money – lots of it.  She has a message that many people want to hear — “America was great once, and it can be great again.”  She’s guaranteed tons of press, mainly because Palin was such good copy.  And she has arrived at a time and a place where she (because Palin is unelectable) is the stand-alone candidate.  Plus, she is the most dangerous of all opponents; she believes in what she’s saying.

Up until now, the Republicans have produced a whole bunch of candidates that ordinary people can’t name (except Newt Gingrich.)  They’ve been busy playing musical chairs with who wants to lose to Obama.  Mitt Romney and Tom Pawlenty are apparently the front runners, but from what I’ve seen, it’s a terminal case of the bland leading the bland.  Not so suddenly, Michele Bachmann shows up in Waterloo, Iowa, with nothing on her mind but the Oval Office, and suddenly she’s tied in the polls with Mitt for 1st place.  This is the kind of momentum politicians scheme about.  Bachmann is a natural press magnet.  Her name recognition is already huge and she’s only been on the job, officially, for 48 hours. Primary season is eight months away.

What everybody — including Romney, Pawlenty and Huntsman — has to remember is the primaries are not about voters.  They are about galvanizing the party faithful; that diehard 15%.  These are the people the candidates have to turn into supporters.  You can’t win primaries without them, and you’re not going to be anything but yesterday’s news without primary victories.  This is where Republican moderates are stumbling around in the dark.  The Tea Party has the high ground.  They show up in numbers and can get their people front and centre.  They can raise huge amounts of money.  They are willing to stand up and be counted.  Unfortunately, they’re also willing to present unelectable candidates (Christine O’Donnell) rather than compromise their principles.

This is the problem.  A lot of people think Michele Bachmann is just Sarah Palin with one less “you betcha,” and they are not going to take her seriously.  This is a mistake.  Bachmann can ride the Tea Party to legitimately become the Republican nominee for President.

If she does, when she gets to the national stage, Barack Obama and the media are going to tear her apart.