Summer: A Time to Wonder Why

Sometimes, reading the news is not the best way to start your day.  I’m not going to recap the body count of disasters pending on our planet, but there seem to be a couple of bucketsful.  So much for the dog days of summer!  Remember when summer was a time when nothing much happened?  When the whole country painted itself into a Norman Rockwell corner and spent the next couple of months lying around, waiting for the colours to dry?  Summer was a time when the beer was cold, young girls were beautiful, old men sat in the park and hot dogs were haute cuisine.  A person could grab a book (that didn’t plug in) and read it or just sit on the grass and contemplate the wisdom of the world.  I’m not lamenting the passing of a former age.  I understand that Rockwell made up those Saturday Evening Post covers, Dennis the Menace was a brat and Father didn’t always know best.  But, however false it might have been, there was a certain security in summer.  It was warm and sleepy.  And there was a vague idea that the bad guys were taking their kids to the beach or something and wouldn’t be plotting our destruction again until after Labour Day.  We had time and leisure to stop and be serious, ask ourselves those insolvable questions or just wonder why.  Nobody ever wonders why anymore.  We all seem to take what we’re given and tough it out.

There’s a famine in the Horn of Africa.  People are starving to death where they stand.  At last count over 10 million folks in Somalia were on the endangered peoples list, and it’s only going to get worse.  It’s common knowledge that Somalia is a basket case country.  Nobody’s in charge, nobody knows what’s going on and nobody cares who does what to whom.  By all accounts, even the Mad Hatter’s is looking around and texting WTF.  But do you ever wonder why we can’t feed these people?  I don’t mean just today or for a while; I mean in the long term.  Why, with all the resources at our disposal we can’t face this human crisis and get things straightened out once and for all? I don’t mean to be flippant, but famines in Africa seem to be one ongoing event.  In my lifetime, millions have died, billions have been spent trying to save them, and nothing ever changes.  We can theorize and chatter all we want about neo-colonialism, addressing the root causes of poverty and blah, blah, blah.  But the reality is we’re doing something wrong.  Do you ever wonder why we keep doing it?

The bottom half of Europe is about to go under.  Portugal, Italy, Greece and Spain are financially fast tracking themselves into Debtor’s Prison.  They’ve borrowed and spent more money than they can possibly pay back in ten generations.  Panic is no longer optional.  Currently, the best financial minds in Europe are wearing out calculators, trying to figure a way out of this economic crisis– and they aren’t having much luck.  But they better hurry because if things get any worse, it could possibly destroy the Euro and even the EU itself.  Do you ever wonder why responsible governments get themselves into these financial problems?  It’s obvious to everybody else on this planet that you can’t spend more money than you make.  Why hasn’t it occurred to any politicians?  Aside from times of war or natural disaster, governments should never be in debt.  I’m not saying governments should make a profit but they might try managing their citizens’ money a little better.  National pride alone should kick in somewhere.  It always amazes me that people who manage their own money responsibly allow their governments to act like drunken sailors.  (No offence to the nautical among you.)  And this has been going on since Nebuchadnezzar II borrowed millions to build The Hanging Gardens for no apparent reason — other than prestige.  But do you ever wonder why?

Finally, Rupert Murdoch was summoned to answer a few questions in front of members of the British Parliament.  This is the final act in a scandal that’s probably been going on for over a decade.  Murdoch is certain he’s ashamed of his organization, but he’s just as certain he’s not responsible for it.  To be fair, he probably isn’t.  I don’t think he has the technical knowledge to hack a phone.  And I doubt very much that the old boy stood in a shadowy alley and handed an envelope full of money over to Constable X for the police records.  However, the last time I looked hacking private telephones and bribing policemen were crimes.  Somebody is responsible for them, and the money had to come from somewhere.  It’s pretty cut and dried.  Unfortunately, in this case, although everybody admits villainy was involved, nobody admits to being a villain.  Don’t you wonder why somebody from Parliament didn’t just ask Murdoch who did it?  It’s a simple question: “If you didn’t do it, who did?  Where did the orders come from, and who carried them out?”  There are no complications here.  The guy was sitting there for a couple of hours.  He had time to get a pie in the face.  Yet nobody bothered to ask him who actually committed the crimes his company is accused of.  This is unbelievable!  Nobody has that much influence.

Tomorrow, I’m going to take my electronic newspaper out on the deck.  I’m going to sit in the morning sun — with my coffee — and wonder why.  Why with all our technology, knowledge and problem-solving ability, we can’t figure out how to feed people, manage our finances or convict criminals.  I’m going remember lazy summers, long gone, and try to figure out if I have any answers.  Maybe the folks who run the world should give that a try, as well.

Barack Obama: Partying like it’s 1967

I’ve never seen the movie Dumb and Dumber; I don’t have to.  All I have to do is sit back and watch President Barack Obama and the US State Department stumble around, stomping on the flowers of the Arab Spring, and I’ve pretty well got the storyline.  These guys make the Keystone Kops look like Sherlock Holmes.  Obama’s most recent foray beyond the Beltway, on May 19th, was one of the oddest speeches I’ve ever heard.  Apparently, it was a major policy statement.  Who knew?  From my point of view, Barack Obama’s Middle East policy sounds, looks and acts like a 2011 cut rate rerun of the much despised Bush Doctrine.  To be sure, Obama stuck to his guns and threw in a lot of rhetoric about change, but that was probably just force of habit.  After all, he’s been yipping about change for nearly four years now — without very much of it actually happening.

Anyway, according to Obama, the way America will effect change in the Middle East is by throwing a couple of billion dollars at the Egyptians, starting a civil war in Libya and ignoring Tunisia and Yemen altogether.  Furthermore, if Bashar al-Assad in Syria doesn’t quit shooting people in the streets America is going to get really, really angry.  And, if Ahmadinejad in Iran continues his reckless pursuit of nuclear weapons, Barack will personally denounce him and call on the world to apply more sanctions, more often.  None of this is new or even news.

After that, the speech was padded out with some fancy footwork, dancing around the situation in Bahrain, where, it seems, there are several different ways to ruthlessly suppress political opposition — and America recognizes all of them.  There were some further admonishments of Iran – like Ali Khamenei cares what Obama thinks – and a friendly wave to the women in the crowd.  However, absolutely glaring by its absence from the Obama Doctrine was any mention of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan.  To be fair, Pakistan is not technically in the Middle East, and perhaps Obama will get around to them later, but Saudi Arabia is smack dab in the middle.  In fact, its importance in the area is what most presidents have called “paramount.”  Talking about the Middle East without talking about Saudi Arabia is like singing the Old Macdonald song without any of the animals: it doesn’t make any sense.  I hate to resort to rhetorical questions but: Is the Kingdom so perfect as to resist the forces of change and self-determination Obama’s talking about?  Or did they just get lost in the desert?   Don’t get me wrong: I don’t mind the realpolitik that says leave the Saudis alone; I just distrust the motivation.  After all, those are Saudi troops in Bahrain.

Of course, Obama saved the best for last – Israel — and the guy was on a roll.  He started off by saying “the status quo is unsustainable” then went on to say “The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines…”  I’m not even going to grace this with an argument.  Obviously, the people in the State Department have never seen a map of the Middle East.  Israel’s pre-1967 borders were indefensible; that’s why they had a war!  Granted, it only lasted six days, but it was pretty memorable.  Who, in their right mind, would think those same borders could be defended any better in 2011?  Wild guess?  Nobody!

The world has changed since 1967.  For example, back then, Elvis was a newlywed, Che Guevara was still alive and a guy by the name of John McCain had just got himself shot down over North Vietnam and was checking in for an extended stay at the Hanoi Hilton.  We were watching Get Smart, The Beverly Hillbillies and Gilligan’s Island on TV and Aretha Franklin was about to record “Respect” – the first time.  Personal computers were unheard of, phones were attached to the wall and most cars got three miles to the gallon.  Hell, we didn’t even have the metric system!  If “the status quo is unsustainable,” how does turning the clock back 44 years help the situation any?

The problem is that it’s not Obama’s fault.  He doesn’t know anything about foreign relations.  Niall Ferguson, a well known British historian, has said — on more than one occasion — that the guy’s clueless.  He’s depending on the State Department to treat him right; this is where you get the dumber part of the equation.  The US State Department has never been the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree, and recently they’ve been spending most of their time unplugged.  This latest adventure in the world of the unknown is just a continuation of the stumble/fumble in the Middle East that started last December.  For example, now that the Egyptians are going to try Mubarak for murder, do you think Gaddafi’s is going to go quietly?  Sometimes I think Hillary’s recruiting her researchers and diplomats at WalMart.

Luckily, Hezbollah and Hamas are still going way too fast on the Crazy Train to let the Palestinians take advantage of the situation.  Nothing is going to happen
for a while, and by that time maybe the American people will quit relying on Hope and Change and take a look around them.  Me?  I’m going to give up
downloading movies and just watch CNN for laughs.