Confessions of a Hipster: Part 2

Young Adult Woman SilhouetteRecently, I was unwittingly placed in a position to observe a cultural phenomenon: the hipster.  Sometimes life just throws the dice.  You can read about it here.  Unable to let opportunity knock without at least saying hello I found myself going mano a mano with Mason (not his real name) a man of high property.  He allowed me to question him closely about the hipster subculture.  Although his answers were not what I expected, a good journalist rolls with the punches and jabs hard to get real answers.  I think you’ll agree this was a hard nut to crack.  I offer his interview here – unedited and raw – like the urban streets that are Mason’s home.  Once again, make no mistake: this is a work of fiction.  The only thing I’ve added are a few notes (in square brackets) that remember the conversation vividly.

Question: In his novel, Pattern Recognition, William Gibson, although he didn’t coin the phrase, uses coolhunter as a motif for society’s search for meaningful dialogue with its future.  In an increasingly monochromatic culture, would you say that hipsters are the coolhunters among us?  By deliberately turning their backs on what many believe is a media-generated world, are hipsters actually leading society away from itself?  As they create fashion and style and then move on, aren’t they inadvertently dragging the rest of us after them?

Answer: No.

Question: Wait!  Wait!  Hear me out.  We live in a cultural hegemony which is both narcissistic and artificial.  Our fashion and fragrance are celebrity driven and repetitive.  Our films are weak fables, espousing the triumph of good over evil; our politics reduced to sound bytes; and our philosophies marketed like breakfast bars.  Aren’t hipsters the antithesis of all that?  By rejecting contemporary style and lifestyle, aren’t they cultural paladins, warring on their own monolithic civilization, which is seeking to deny them their cultural imperative?

Answer: No.

Question: Are you being ironic?

Answer: [He gave me a look of constipation.]

Question: Okay, let’s take a different tack.  Hipsters were born out of the 21st Century’s economic instability, which has, in turn,hipster1 led to a decrease in social mobility.  Since we can no longer economically guarantee that we will even maintain our social position — never mind rise above our class — young people have become disillusioned with the very ethos of our society.  They believe that we are approaching a social stagnation that can lead only to cultural bankruptcy.  Therefore, they have abandoned traditional long-term social mores in favour of immediate urban credibility – street creds — credits.  They gather this cultural currency by stylistic innovation.  Thus, they not only maintain their social status but can enhance it through anticipating the avant garde.  Would you say this is a fair statement?

Answer: No.  This is easy.

Question:  Okay, then.  Ironic is the hipster’s stock in trade.  Isn’t it the greatest irony in the world that hipsters are actually the parents of cultural change?  They conceive it in their very lifestyle.  The time between when the first hipster moves in and the last hipster moves on is the gestation period, and its birth is when it’s adopted by mainstream culture.

Answer: [He looked at me as if he was seeing me for the first time.  I knew I had him]

Question: Then what would you say about the hipster subculture?  [I pointed a journalistic finger.]

Answer: Tintin.

Question: What?

Answer: Tintin is the original hipster.  And you are obviously not from Indiana.

[As he stood up and walked away I was humbled by his perceptions.]hipster3

Confessions of a Hipster

Young Adult Woman SilhouetteMake no mistake: the following is a work of fiction.  In the 21st Century, truth wears many faces — and one of them is false

Last weekend (although, these days, I have no fear of assassination) I was sitting with my back to the wall in a Tiki Lounge, sipping a Singapore Sling.  The room was crowded and oddly dim for Polynesia, so I didn’t see the 30-something somebody approach — until he spoke.

“Are you being ironic?”

Even though I hadn’t been ironic since Thursday afternoon, I said yes and volunteered that I was surprised that anyone noticed.  He hovered for a few seconds in a crooked smile.  I identified myself as a journalist from Indiana (which wasn’t strictly a lie) and said, “I’d like to tell your story.”

“What is it?” he answered

“A completely authentic pickup line?” I asked.

“I like your style,” he said and sat down.

“I like yours, too.  Are you a hipster?”

My new friend Mason (not his real name) said labels were for the media and the weak, and swept his arm religiously across the room.  “Those are hipsters,” he said, and leaned in close, “but most of them aren’t real.”

“How can you tell?”

“You can smell the Urban Outfitter from here,” he said, coming out of the lean.

“See that piece?” he pointed limply to a group half turned away from us, twitching their thumbs, “It’s a Galaxy.”

Satisfied with himself, he drank his beer – a Miller High Life – from the bottle.

My new friend might not have been a hipster but he could obviously tell a smartphone brand from facial glow alone.  This was definitely a man of high property.

“Most of what you see wasn’t here in oh-eight,” he said.  “SoMo was fresh then.  The music…” he straightened his limp hand and made a definite high line in the air, “… was tall.”

His tone told me I didn’t understand.  I didn’t.

He pointed in several directions with both hands.

“There were thrifts and ground floors and Molly Rag Scratch played the Biltmore.  See that?” He vaguely pointed again.  “He drives a car.  It’s Modo but really.  He probably works for his father.”

Across the room, I didn’t notice a sweater-tight tee shirt, pointing with his nose, or the three other sweaters who followed him.

“Come on,”  Mason said.

We walked, head nodding through the bar and out the back door into a night-bright alley where the sweaters stood in the roadway looking at me.

“He’s from Indie,”  Mason said.

They were satisfied with that and lit long yellow cigarettes without speaking, then crumbled black hashish into a retro Hefnerhipster6 pipe.

“It’s Ketama.”

I declined the pipe on the pass around, making a mental note to google “Ketama.”  A journalist’s best weapon is a clear mind.

“He’s looking for hipsters.”

“He found one,” said a sweater, pointing a direct finger at Mason.  No one laughed.

“The hipsters are gone.” said another one, his words covered in smoke, “Urban genocide.”

“Too many taxpayers.”

“Three chord gnarlome.”

“Exhilarating news.”

“Molotov!” they all said, simultaneously.

The sweaters were clearly warming to the event.

For the next twenty minutes, they spoke around me.  They explain to themselves that once there might have been hipsters here, but that was only a name.  This was sometime in the recent past when the neighbourhood had been … somebody said “deck” and the others laughed at him.  Whoever they were, these people were social Jules Vernes.  They anticipated the trends, saw the tempos, and lived ahead of the mainstream tsunami.  Unwilling to accept cultural hand-me-downs from a corporate society, they made their own bold new culture out of leftover fashions and underground movies.  However, it was music which set the rhythm; music that varied the direction; travelling through rap, techno, hip hop, dub step and strange indie metal.  They settled on music as both the Shiva and Kali of the neighbourhood; first bringing it life but then bringing it people who, drawn by mere musical cool, were neither authentic nor sincere.  Like white people going to Harlem, they were tourists and not committed to the circumstantial experience.  They became slaves to the scene — no longer creating it.

“But what did you mean when you called them taxpayers?” I questioned, gesturing back to the bar.

Everyone stopped.  I had betrayed myself, and now I have broken the mood.

“Ask them,” said a sweater, making an elevated chin.  “We have to go.”

“Stul.”

“Stul.”

We all stulled each other and the sweaters walked down the alley.  Mason and I returned to the Tiki room, where our drinks were gone and my table reoccupied.  I reached around a young shaggy to retrieve my jacket off the chair.  Mason stared sullenly into the corner.  He had been dissed in front of the heathen by mere children, and he didn’t like it.  We found a place at the end of the bar.

“May I ask you some questions?”

“Something personal, I hope,” he said menacingly.

Wednesday: Interview with a Hipster.

Animal Rights: So Very Wrong

dog2Where the hell is PETA when you need them?  Nowhere to be seen!  They’re probably going celebrity naked in the parking lot of some KFC in beautiful downtown New Zealand, protecting the chicken parts from the Colonel’s 11 secret herbs and spices.  I’m not saying these folks are useless (they’re so close nobody has to say it) but it strikes me that they’re pretty picky/choosy about which animal’s right they want to defend.  While they’re jet setting around the world, taking their clothes off, I’m walking through a park in North America, seeing dogs (yes, more than one, and on more than one occasion) with nail polish!  The kicker is these aren’t perpetually abused Paris Hilton purse puppies; they’re regular dogs who stay, fetch and pee on trees.  I’m not heavily into anthropomorphism, but I don’t care how you slice it: forcing a trusting companion to look like an idiot in public is a violation of its right to a modicum of dignity.  If PETA isn’t going to do its job, what good are they?

In general, I agree with the Animal Rights people.  We’re sharing this planet with all manner of other creatures, and just because we’re the dominant species, that doesn’t mean we have carte blanche to kick them.  We’re civilized people, for God sake.  Our basic tenet should be “Do unto others…etc. etc.” and that includes no chasing them with guns, harpoons or pointy sticks and cutting off their body parts for tacky trophies, trendy lunches or hocus-pocus medicine.  It’s been a number of centuries since we’ve had to beat our food over the head just to eat it, and it’s time we realized that.

By the same token, I’m really tired of has-been celebrities making headline out of high profile attempts to deny what can only be called food’s natural destiny.  Now hear this!  The stated purpose of billions of chickens on this earth is to be extra crispy.  It’s the truth.  To all the vegetarians out there, good on ya.  However, millions of us are not of the faith; therefore, that chicken has to die for our culinary sins.  What the Animal Rights crowd doesn’t understand is the relationship between we humans and that chicken is not much different from our relationship to the cabbage in the coleslaw or the disodium ginaphinate (or whatever?) in the buttermilk biscuits.  We’re not friends, and we haven’t betrayed a trust.  Trying to square peg this into a moral round hole is a substantial waste of time, energy and resources.

This ultimately brings us back to my encounter in the park with the oddly-decorated Canis Lupus Famillaris.  While the Animaldogs7 Rights crew have been prancing around the world in God’s underwear, reading the ethical riot act to anyone with a camera, all over North America, canines are being treated like crap.  It might not be SPCA-worthy, physical cruelty – but so what?  If you believe, as I do, that dogs are smarter than we give them credit for, it can`t be anything short of psychological abuse.  Dogs are not supposed to wear nail polish.  Nor are they supposed to wear jewelry, hats, coats, scarves, those stupid little socks or idiot reindeer antlers at Christmas.  (Okay, if you and your Chihuahua live at the South Pole, bundle him up for walkies, but otherwise it’s none of the above.)  Doing any of these things to an unsuspecting dog is breaking an ancient, sacred trust.

I’m not going to revisit tens of thousands of years of canine/human coexistence — there’s no need.  Over the centuries, dogs have given their masters unqualified trust, but in recent history, many of them are being repaid by being forced to look ridiculous for a few gratuitous grins or a funny Pinterest image.  I don’t know what these dogs are thinking, but you don’t have to be Cesar Millan to know it’s unethical to take advantage of a subordinate when you are in a position of power.  Yet, PETA (People for the ETHICAL Treatment of Animals) could give a rat’s bum for these designer dogs because it’s not sexy and it’s not trendy and it’s not oh-so-sensitive.  It’s just a mutt with a pirate hat and an eye patch.  PETA, you need to change your name or get out of the multinational worthy cause business!